Yesterday, 05:50 PM
(Yesterday, 07:55 AM)nakai Wrote: Hello,
I apologize for following up again, but I was wondering if you might have had a chance to review my previous question.
If there are any points in my explanation that are unclear, or if any additional information would be helpful in order to answer the question, please let me know. I would be happy to provide further details.
Regarding the previously suggested approach of increasing the simulation update frequency by reducing the timestep, I have also tested this method. However, in my application, this results in a significant decrease in simulation performance, so unfortunately it is difficult to use this approach in practice.
Therefore, I would greatly appreciate any advice regarding whether the method described in my previous post could be used as an alternative.
Thank you very much for your time and assistance.
Hi Nakai,
Yes, your approach can work as an approximation.
Kind regards,

