Yesterday, 10:30 AM
(Yesterday, 10:16 AM)josemendez Wrote: You're right, they were supposed to be compatible with rods but this got postponed. The reason they're not fully compatible with rods is that rods cannot be torn, so a bit of extra logic needs to be added to the constraint projection to account for this.
Still, the fact they were originally planned for both slipped into the documentation.
If your use case involves using pinholes with rods, will see if I can do a quick fix to support them (even if it's not 100% accurate) and get back to you.
kind regards
It makes sense then!
Currently I consider to use them, but it's not the most critical feature.
Actually one more question - why pinhole requires target to be obi collider, while the field itself is of type transform?