28-09-2020, 08:42 AM
I am indeed using dynamic constraints.
What's this mass ratio in relation to? I tried adjusting the mass on the parent object from 500 to 50000 with no change in behaviour and the rope/solver doesn't appear to use mass anywhere. Only the mass of the objects the ropes are carrying that seem to have an affect.
I found increasing substeps caused eratic behaviour where the ropes would randomly move around and drastically affected performance. I wasn't happy with the length of the ropes until the distance iterations were at around 100 at which point frame rate was reduced to a slide show on a 2080ti and Ryzen 3700x. I also found that the large masses were causing a lot of oscillations that don't seem to go away very quickly even with a high damper on the obi solver.
I've also tried scaling the mass of the objects down but I have to scale it down so much that the behaviour of the objects no longer looks natural i.e. it messes with the inertia.
Any other ideas?
What's this mass ratio in relation to? I tried adjusting the mass on the parent object from 500 to 50000 with no change in behaviour and the rope/solver doesn't appear to use mass anywhere. Only the mass of the objects the ropes are carrying that seem to have an affect.
I found increasing substeps caused eratic behaviour where the ropes would randomly move around and drastically affected performance. I wasn't happy with the length of the ropes until the distance iterations were at around 100 at which point frame rate was reduced to a slide show on a 2080ti and Ryzen 3700x. I also found that the large masses were causing a lot of oscillations that don't seem to go away very quickly even with a high damper on the obi solver.
I've also tried scaling the mass of the objects down but I have to scale it down so much that the behaviour of the objects no longer looks natural i.e. it messes with the inertia.
Any other ideas?